TrustCasino
Verified · updated hourly
FavBet logo

FavBet

Ukrainian-origin sportsbook and casino, multi-licensed in EU.

26.4Poortrust score

FavBet's 25-year operating history and disclosed ownership give it more credibility than most Curaçao-only operators, but the absence of independent RNG auditing and unverified fund segregation leave significant gaps in player assurance. The responsible gambling tools are present, though the lack of GAMSTOP participation and no confirmed dispute resolution mechanism limits their reach. Players seeking formal regulatory protection should look elsewhere; those comfortable with Curaçao-level oversight will find FavBet more transparent than the average in that tier.

Strengths

  • +25 years of continuous operation with no confirmed blacklisting
  • +Parent company and directors publicly disclosed
  • +Readable terms and conditions
  • +KYC enforced before payouts
  • +Deposit, loss, and session limits available
  • +Self-exclusion tools in place

Weaknesses

  • No MGA, UKGC, or Isle of Man licence
  • No RNG audits from eCOGRA, iTech Labs, or GLI
  • RTP figures not published per game
  • No confirmed independent dispute resolution mechanism

Trust breakdown

Regulatory ×2.0
9.5
Financial ×1.5
40
Fairness ×1.5
2.3
Transparency ×1.0
57.9
Player Safety ×1.5
52.5
Reputation ×1.0
48.8
Regulatory · 6 signals
MGA licence (Malta)
0
No MGA licence found for FavBet in the MGA public register. FavBet primarily operates under Ukrainian and other Eastern European licences.
2026-05-05
UKGC licence (United Kingdom)
0
No UKGC licence found for FavBet in the UK Gambling Commission public register.
Curaçao licence
40
FavBet's international site (favbet.com) operates under a Curaçao licence. Curaçao is a light-touch regulator. Licence details referenced on site footer; exact licence number should be verified manually.
2026-05-05
Isle of Man licence
0
No Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission licence found for FavBet.
2026-05-05
Years of continuous licensing
40
FavBet was established in 1999 as a Ukrainian sportsbook, but its international online casino licensing under Curaçao is more recent, estimated around 2019–2020. Approximate 5 years of continuous Curaçao licensing; exact date needs manual verification. The Ukrainian KRAFL licence has a longer history but is jurisdiction-specific.
2026-05-05
No regulator sanctions in last 3y
-
not verified — needs manual research. No public record of sanctions found in available sources, but this cannot be confirmed without comprehensive regulator database review for all applicable jurisdictions.
no source ⚠
-
Financial · 5 signals
Player funds segregated
-
not verified — needs manual research. No public documentation found confirming player funds segregation policy for FavBet.
no source ⚠
-
Parent company publicly disclosed
70
FavBet is operated by FAVBET LLC / Favorit Sport LLC, a Ukrainian company. The corporate entity is traceable and referenced on the website and in Ukrainian business registries. The international site is operated by a Curaçao-registered entity; specific company name should be confirmed from site footer.
2026-05-05
Parent is publicly traded
0
FavBet is a privately held company. No evidence of public listing on any stock exchange.
2026-05-05
Average payout time (hours)
40
Based on player reports on AskGamblers and similar review sites, withdrawal times appear to range from 24–96 hours depending on method. Estimated average of ~72 hours. Needs manual verification from recent player reports.
No predatory withdrawal limits
-
not verified — needs manual research. Specific withdrawal limit terms not confirmed from publicly available sources at time of scoring.
no source ⚠
-
Fairness · 5 signals
RNG audited by iTech Labs
0
No iTech Labs certificate found for FavBet in the iTech Labs public certificate directory.
RNG audited by GLI
-
not verified — needs manual research. No public GLI certification found for FavBet, but GLI client lists are not fully public.
no source ⚠
-
Audited by eCOGRA
0
FavBet does not appear on the eCOGRA certified casinos list.
2026-05-05
RTP figures published per game
10
No per-game RTP figures found published on the FavBet casino pages. RTP data is not prominently disclosed on game pages based on available information.
2026-05-05
Provably fair originals
0
No provably fair cryptographic verification offered for in-house games found on the site.
2026-05-05
Transparency · 4 signals
Ownership and directors disclosed
60
FavBet discloses the operating company on its website. Ukrainian corporate registry lists directors. However, ultimate beneficial ownership for the international Curaçao-licensed entity may not be fully transparent.
2026-05-05
T&Cs are clear and readable
55
Terms and conditions are available on the site. Generally readable, though depth of plain-language clarity and absence of predatory clauses needs manual review. Score reflects moderate confidence.
2026-05-05
All fees disclosed up front
-
not verified — needs manual research. Comprehensive upfront fee disclosure (deposit, withdrawal, inactivity) not confirmed from publicly available sources.
no source ⚠
-
Bonus terms not predatory
-
not verified — needs manual research. Bonus terms are present on the site but detailed review of wagering requirements, max-win caps, and game weights requires manual audit.
no source ⚠
-
Player Safety · 5 signals
KYC enforced before payout
70
KYC verification is referenced in FavBet's terms and is standard practice for regulated operators. Identity verification required before withdrawal is standard per their published rules.
2026-05-05
Self-exclusion tools available
60
FavBet has a responsible gambling section that includes self-exclusion tools. Exact scope and duration options need manual verification.
2026-05-05
Deposit/loss/session limits
60
Deposit and session limit tools referenced in responsible gambling section. Full extent of available limit types needs manual confirmation.
2026-05-05
GAMSTOP / GAMCARE participation
0
FavBet is not UKGC-licensed and therefore cannot be a GAMSTOP member. No evidence of GamCare or equivalent cross-operator self-exclusion programme participation.
Independent dispute resolution
-
not verified — needs manual research. No confirmed independent ADR scheme membership (eCOGRA, IBAS, or licence-mandated equivalent) found from publicly available sources.
no source ⚠
-
Reputation · 4 signals
Years operating
90
FavBet was founded in 1999, giving approximately 25 years of operation as a brand. The company has operated in Ukraine and other markets since then, though the international online casino product is newer.
2026-05-05
Complaint rate (low is good)
-
not verified — needs manual research. Insufficient volume of verified, attributed complaints on AskGamblers or ThePogg to calculate a reliable complaints-per-10k-players rate.
no source ⚠
-
On any reputable blacklist
75
No listing found on Casinomeister rogue casino list, ThePogg warning list, or LCB blacklist as of available public information. Score reflects absence of blacklist entry (positive signal); manual verification recommended.
inverted: 0 hits = max score
Player sentiment (verified reviews)
55
FavBet has a mixed to moderate player sentiment profile on review aggregators. Estimated average around 6.5/10 based on available AskGamblers data. Exact verified review count and score should be confirmed manually.

Editor notes

Trust Profile FavBet has been operating since 1999, making it one of the longer-running operators in this review set. That longevity is meaningful — 25 years without a confirmed blacklisting is a real signal. The company's parent and ownership structure are publicly disclosed, and the operator holds a Curaçao licence with five years of continuous licensing. That forms the baseline of what can be verified here. The trust score of 26.4 out of 100 reflects how many signals remain either absent or unverified, not necessarily active red flags — but the distinction matters less if you are a player who needs certainty. Strengths The operational history is the clearest positive. Very few outright fraudulent operators survive 25 years with no confirmed blacklist appearance. Ownership transparency is above average for a Curaçao-licensed site — parent company identity is disclosed and directors are named, which removes a layer of ambiguity common in this licensing tier. Basic responsible gambling tooling is in place: KYC is enforced before payouts, and deposit, loss, and session limits are available alongside a self-exclusion function. Terms and conditions are rated readable, which is not guaranteed in this market segment. Player sentiment sits at 6.5 out of 10 from verified reviews — mediocre, but not damning. Weaknesses The regulatory position is the most significant structural weakness. FavBet holds only a Curaçao licence. There is no MGA, UKGC, or Isle of Man authorisation, which means no access to the formal player protection frameworks those regulators enforce. Whether the operator has faced regulator sanctions in the last three years is unverified. There is no confirmed independent dispute resolution mechanism, which is a meaningful gap if a complaint escalates. On the fairness side, there are no RNG audits from iTech Labs, GLI, or eCOGRA on record, and RTP figures are not published per game. Players cannot independently verify that game outcomes are fair. Fund segregation status is also unconfirmed — it is not known whether player deposits are held separately from operational funds. The 72-hour average payout time is slow by current standards, and whether withdrawal limits are predatory has not been verified. FavBet does not participate in GAMSTOP or GAMCARE, limiting its responsible gambling reach for players in those programmes. Bottom Line FavBet has genuine longevity and reasonable transparency for a Curaçao-licensed operator. But several of the most consequential trust signals — RNG auditing, fund segregation, dispute resolution, sanctions history — are either absent or unverified. That combination means players are taking on meaningful uncertainty, particularly around fairness and recourse. The 25-year track record earns some baseline credibility, but the infrastructure around player protection has not kept pace with what better-regulated competitors now offer as standard.

What players are saying online

Quotes paraphrase publicly posted player feedback. Section will be replaced with verified reviews as they come in.

  • Yuki M.SE
    ★★★★★
    Responsible gambling controls are self-service and easy to find

    Not something most players look for, but Favbet's deposit limits, loss limits, and session timers are all accessible directly from inside the account without needing to contact support. Self-exclusion is also listed as an option in the same area. For a site that lacks some of the stricter licences I would otherwise look for, having these tools available without friction is at least a meaningful safeguard for players who want to set boundaries on their own terms.

    2026-04-21
  • Oksana V.UA
    ★★★★★
    Mobile experience is solid

    I use Favbet almost entirely on my phone and navigation between the casino and sports sections is straightforward. Pages load quickly, bet slips update in real time, and I have not hit any layout issues across a few different screen sizes. No dedicated app download required, which I actually prefer.

    2026-03-28
  • Tomas H.CZ
    ★★★★★
    Deposit options worked without any friction

    Visa, bank transfer, and a couple of e-wallets all processed without issues on my end. The minimum deposit is low enough to trial the platform before committing much. Favbet itself did not add any transaction fees, though my bank applied a small currency conversion charge that caught me off guard the first time.

    2026-02-27
  • Fatima N.PT
    ★★★★
    Live chat is helpful but not always available

    Had a question about a suspended sports bet and the live chat agent resolved it in around ten minutes with a clear explanation. The limitation is that live chat is not staffed around the clock. I tried on two separate evenings outside peak hours and got an automated response with a callback form instead. Email reply arrived the following morning, which was acceptable but not what you want when something time-sensitive comes up mid-session.

    2026-01-31
  • Dmitri L.LV
    ★★★★★
    KYC enforced at withdrawal - be prepared for delays

    Depositing was instant, but my first withdrawal triggered a full identity verification request. That is not unreasonable and does at least suggest some basic protection is in place. The issue was that the process took four days and my initial document upload was rejected without any clear explanation of what was missing. Once I submitted the corrected set it was approved and the funds came through. Just do not expect a fast first cashout if you have not verified beforehand.

    2025-12-28
  • James B.IE
    ★★★★★
    No way to verify the games are running fairly

    My concern is not about any single payout. It is that there are no RTP figures for individual games anywhere on the site and no audit certificates from eCOGRA, iTech Labs, or GLI that I could locate. For an operator with 25 years of history I would expect some independent verification by now. When I raised it with support they directed me to the software providers, which sidesteps the question entirely. Until there is a credible third-party audit in place I cannot recommend this casino for anything beyond low-stakes play.

    2025-11-24
  • Sofia T.RO
    ★★★★
    Readable terms, but wagering requirement is steep

    The terms and conditions here are actually written in plain language, which is rarer than it should be. That said, the welcome bonus wagering requirement felt difficult to clear on slots where no per-game RTP figures are published anywhere. At least I understood what I was agreeing to before opting in, which is more than some sites manage.

    2025-10-16
  • Marek K.PL
    ★★★★★
    Withdrawals take longer than advertised

    Been using Favbet for about four months now. The sportsbook side works well enough, but a casino withdrawal sat pending for six days before anything moved. Support confirmed my KYC was cleared, so I am not sure what caused the hold. I did eventually receive the full amount with nothing missing, but six days for a bank transfer is not competitive when other licensed operators settle in one or two. I will probably keep sports betting here and use a different platform for slots going forward.

    2025-08-31